- ParalegalGateway
- Posts
- The Attorney–Client Privilege Is Not Limited to Communications Directly Between a Client and His or Her Attorney
The Attorney–Client Privilege Is Not Limited to Communications Directly Between a Client and His or Her Attorney
An Archive Article
Welcome! In this edition we will feature a classic article from the past as well as introducing you to some Paralegal specific products from our Sponsors. We do encourage you to visit our Sponsors as they keep the free version of the newsletter available for everyone.
ETHICS
The Attorney-Client Privilege Is Not Limited to Communications Directly Between a Client and His or Her Attorney
[Orginally published August 10, 2011] The issue also arises as to whether the legal opinions may be shared with a non-attorney agent retained by the attorney to assist with the representation without losing their confidential status. It appears that they can, as such an agent would fall into the category of “those to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for the transmission of the information or the accomplishment of the purpose for which the lawyer is consulted.” Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. Superior Court 2011 WL 2536502, 5 (Cal.App. 2 Dist.) (Cal.App. 2 Dist.,2011)
PARALEGAL PRODUCT
The Litigation Paralegal
Succeed in your course and prepare for your paralegal career with THE LITIGATION PARALEGAL: A SYSTEMS APPROACH, SIXTH EDITION. Combining theories and principles of law with practical skills, this engaging, highly visual text includes numerous forms, checklists, and online resources in the context of the law office. The book covers the latest electronic discovery issues and the associated ethical and practical responsibilities of the paralegal. It also includes a wide range of new and updated cases, practical tips, assignments, key terms, and study questions to help you master the content.
Reply